27" QD-OLED, 1440p at 240 Hz with HDR400 True Black
Indicative price range, not the actual price. You'll see the exact, current price on Amazon.
Affiliate disclosure: LatenciaCero is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. The product links on this site are affiliate links, and if you buy through them we earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
A WOLED uses a white subpixel with colour filters; a QD-OLED emits blue and converts it with quantum dots, with no filter eating energy. In practice that means more saturation at high brightness and 110% DCI-P3 coverage. In game it means the colours that carry information — enemy outlines, ability markers — stand out more against the background.
True Black certification requires a black level below 0.0005 nits. Against an LCD with local dimming, here each pixel switches off completely, so on a night map in Valorant there's no grey veil hiding an enemy crouched in a corner.
That's this monitor's decisive argument: it delivers the same 240 Hz / 0.03 ms pairing as a premium OLED for considerably less money. What's been trimmed is the chassis and the stand's ergonomics, not the panel.
Scores from 0 to 10 assigned by our editors from the spec sheet and compared within each category. These aren't manufacturer figures: they're our judgement. You can read the method in how we choose.
| Panel & image | |
|---|---|
| Diagonal | 27 " |
| Panel type | QD-OLED |
| Finish | Glossy |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) |
| Brightness | — |
| Contrast | 1,500,000:1 |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 110.2 % |
| HDR | HDR400 True Black |
| Speed & latency | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Frame duration | 4.17 ms |
| Response time (GtG) | 0.03 ms |
| Motion blur reduction | Native OLED response (no strobing) |
| Adaptive sync | G-SYNC Compatible / Adaptive-Sync |
| Connections & ergonomics | |
| Video ports | DisplayPort + HDMI |
| Stand adjustments | Basic stand according to buyer reviews |
| Competitive extras | HDR400 True Black, 147.6% sRGB coverage |
| Weight | 8.03 kg |
| Other | |
| Warranty | 3 years |
| Other listing details | |
| sRGB coverage | 147.6% |
| Controls | Four physical buttons |
| In the box | HDMI cable, power cord and manual |
| Format | 16:9 |
Fields with no data show as “—”: it means neither Amazon nor the manufacturer publishes that figure. We'd rather leave it empty than estimate it.
240 Hz, instant response and the best contrast of the three for picking silhouettes out of dark areas. Against the BenQ you lose 40 Hz and the DyAc strobing; against the ASUS you lose very little and gain on price. For a competitive player on a budget, it's the best ratio in this category.
Almost as good as the ASUS: the same panel speed and even more colour saturation, which helps track the ball. It falls behind on stand adjustment, which matters if you need a very specific height to play comfortably.
The same warnings as any OLED with a fixed HUD, offset by colours that make a shader world look far better than on an LCD. The 147.6% sRGB coverage is more than the game needs, so it's worth using a clamped colour mode so it doesn't look oversaturated.
A very good all-rounder: the same 240 Hz as the ASUS, an excellent panel and a friendlier price. If the machine is shared at home between gaming, homework and video, this is the one that gives the most performance per euro.
Ideal for: Someone who wants to get into 240 Hz OLED for as little as possible and can live with a simple stand.
The consensus in the reviews is 'best OLED for the money': buyers arriving from 100-144 Hz IPS panels describing the jump as enormous, with praise for the glossy finish and the HDR. Criticism concentrates on the basic stand and the four-button menu navigation.
Our own synthesis based on published opinions about the product. We don't reproduce third-party reviews.
