27" QD-OLED, 1440p at 240 Hz with HDR400 True Black
Indicative price captured on Amazon on September 7, 2026. It may have changed: check it on Amazon before buying.
Affiliate disclosure: LatenciaCero is a participant in the Amazon Associates Program. The product links on this site are affiliate links, and if you buy through them we earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
A WOLED uses a white subpixel with colour filters; a QD-OLED emits blue and converts it with quantum dots, with no filter eating energy. In practice that means more saturation at high brightness and 110% DCI-P3 coverage. In game it means the colours that carry information — enemy outlines, ability markers — stand out more against the background.
True Black certification requires a black level below 0.0005 nits. Against an LCD with local dimming, here each pixel switches off completely, so on a night map in Valorant there's no grey veil hiding an enemy crouched in a corner.
That's this monitor's decisive argument: it delivers the same 240 Hz / 0.03 ms pairing as a premium OLED for considerably less money. What's been trimmed is the chassis and the stand's ergonomics, not the panel.
Scores from 0 to 10 assigned by our editors from the spec sheet and compared within each category. These aren't manufacturer figures: they're our judgement. You can read the method in how we choose.
| Panel & image | |
|---|---|
| Diagonal | 27 " |
| Panel type | QD-OLED |
| Finish | Glossy |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) |
| Brightness | — |
| Contrast | 1,500,000:1 |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 110.2 % |
| HDR | HDR400 True Black |
| Speed & latency | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| Frame duration | 4.17 ms |
| Response time (GtG) | 0.03 ms |
| Motion blur reduction | Native OLED response (no strobing) |
| Adaptive sync | G-SYNC Compatible / Adaptive-Sync |
| Connections & ergonomics | |
| Video ports | DisplayPort + HDMI |
| Stand adjustments | Basic stand according to buyer reviews |
| Competitive extras | HDR400 True Black, 147.6% sRGB coverage |
| Weight | 8.03 kg |
| Other | |
| Warranty | 3 years |
| Other listing details | |
| sRGB coverage | 147.6% |
| Controls | Four physical buttons |
| In the box | HDMI cable, power cord and manual |
| Format | 16:9 |
Fields with no data show as “—”: it means neither Amazon nor the manufacturer publishes that figure. We'd rather leave it empty than estimate it.
240 Hz, instant response and the best contrast of the three for picking silhouettes out of dark areas. Against the BenQ you lose 40 Hz and the DyAc strobing; against the ASUS you lose very little and gain on price. For a competitive player on a budget, it's the best ratio in this category.
Almost as good as the ASUS: the same panel speed and even more colour saturation, which helps track the ball. It falls behind on stand adjustment, which matters if you need a very specific height to play comfortably.
The same warnings as any OLED with a fixed HUD, offset by colours that make a shader world look far better than on an LCD. The 147.6% sRGB coverage is more than the game needs, so it's worth using a clamped colour mode so it doesn't look oversaturated.
A very good all-rounder: the same 240 Hz as the ASUS, an excellent panel and a friendlier price. If the machine is shared at home between gaming, homework and video, this is the one that gives the most performance per euro.
Ideal for: Someone who wants to get into 240 Hz OLED for as little as possible and can live with a simple stand.
The consensus in the reviews is 'best OLED for the money': buyers arriving from 100-144 Hz IPS panels describing the jump as enormous, with praise for the glossy finish and the HDR. Criticism concentrates on the basic stand and the four-button menu navigation.
It’s an OLED so its gonna be good. I didn’t have any text fringing or eye strain even after 4 hours straight use. Picture quality is great. Brightness is good enough for me.Im impressed by the colors on it. It doesn’t get any better in this price. Now the cons are that the upper side of the panel is very thin so if I want to tilt it up or down with my monitor arm I’d feel more confident doing it holding the bottom part. The HDMI doesn’t support more than 165hz on this monitor so I had to use display port for that sweet 240hz refresh rate. You could use an HDMI to DP cable if you don’t have any display port option in your pc or laptop. The bezels are a bit thicker than I expected, You’ll noti
It is the best monitor in the world the reaction time is very low stable colors 240hz for competitive of any game and the resolution is perfect if you doubt like this or an ips with more hz believe me that this monitor is the best you have at 240 hz
Beautiful display and i really like the glossy finish. Great HDR and peak brightness. Very happy. Stand is pretty basic and 4 button control is kinda whatever. Overall great entry into the OLED world
this was a MASSIVE upgrade from my last monitor in EVERY department (onn 24 inch IPS 100hz). this is also my first OLED. i'm blown away. amazing picture quality, great colors. i was really worried about HDR after all of the reviews saying it's really bad on this monitor. i calibrated it, changed the setting in the AOC g-menu software to "displayHDR" and tweaked the colors slightly in the AMD software and i think it looks fantastic in my games. this is also my first HDR monitor though, so i have no real reference point lol... i will say if you turn HDR off though this monitor is not very bright at all. as others have said, brightness is linked to contrast on this monitor, so if you need to in
Reviews reproduced from the product page on Amazon on the capture date (September 7, 2026). We haven't edited or translated them: they're what the listing itself shows.
